« Why an investigation now? | Main | What a Week »

Thinking About The South: An Apology

I have had occasion to regret the tone and tenor of recent remarks here about the South. I have, apparently, carried some unresolved and unexamined bile with me for a very long time, and made the mistake of spewing it here in the column. I will not describe in detail a column item you can look up if you're that interested, because I choose not to repeat the libel. Suffice it to say that numerous people whose opinion I respect, including my own parents, have told me in no uncertain terms I was out of line.

My mother commented, in an echo of a comment made by a friend who asked that his remarks be kept confidential. How would I like it if people said Portland was a place they never wanted to visit because of the Meth epidemic or the regular police shooting of African Americans? And how would I feel if someone suggested that we'd be better off without Oregon in the Union because some Oregon politicians have behaved badly (including our once-sainted Bob Packwood and Neal Goldschmidt--one from each party).

I teach my students Freud's dictum that we most hate the people we are most like, and advise them to look to their own souls when they find themselves hating someone. On top of that, one of the things I find most despicable about the right is its demonization of its opponents. As the Cold War proved so vividly, when you are in the heat of battle, it is easy to become the thing you hate. I demonized a region and its politicians, as I have done for 40 years--and for 40 years I was wrong.

We must get out of the miasma of poisonous politics that descended on this country in 1998. People of good will on both sides of the aisle are going to have to accept that there is good in all of and that we can agree to disagree and meet in the center, not ram radical changes and solutions down the throats of our opponents.

Republicans are not bad and evil people. At the risk of being trite, some of my best friends are Republicans. They honestly believe they are doing what is right for the country. I honestly believe they are wrong. We need to keep the discussion at that level, or else experience eternal gridlock.

If not for the Orwellian implications, I would be tempted to remove my rant about the South from the Internet, which would make it difficult, albeit not impossible, to find. I have no desire to use Big Brother's memory hole, and I have mocked, in this column, GOP efforts (and/or failures) to cleanse websites of embarrassing historical artifacts. On the other hand, I frequently laud the Internet for its ability to allow us to correct mistakes that one could never correct in the dead tree media.

And so I ask--what do you think? Should I delete the offensive rant, in addition to recanting it, apologizing for it and promising to try not to write anything like it ever again?

And, of course, I am revising my opinion about the Civil War. I am now, as I always have been, sorry that our nation's regional disagreements had to be settled by force of arms. We were right to insist on an indivisible union and a federal system and we were right to accept the South's return.

I was even right that the South was responsible for a number of indignities in American political history. But the Bible advises us to judge not, lest we be judged. Matthew 7:3 asks, "Why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye." To say we'd have been better off without the South is to judge a region and its people by the behavior of a few--something I wouldn't appreciate if it were done to me and my region of the country.

The North has made mistakes, and done awful things to African Americans as well as others (e.g.: the Japanese in WWII). The North also was responsible for a number of indignities in American political history. The first step towards healing and reconciliation is for both sides to admit they've made mistakes.

I honestly believe the GOP side find it difficult to admit error and culpability, but someone has to take the first step. I was wrong and it was my fault.

Let the healing begin.

My Photo

You COULD

Search PSACOT Using Google

  • Google

    WWW psacot

Blogrolling

Recent Movies

  • Now Showing

    (N-Neal Vitale P-Paul Schindler). Stars are out of 5 Recent Films

    Chéri 3 p
    Girlfriend Experience (The) 2.5 n
    Hangover (The) 2.5 p 4.5n
    Heart of Stone 4 n
    Land of the Lost 2 p
    Proposal (The) 3.5 p
    Taking of Pelham 123 2.5 p
    Up 4 p
    Whatever Works 4 p
    Year One 3 p 1.5 n

  • DVD Releases

    Curious Case of Benjamin Button (The) 5 n
    Gran Torino 4 n
    International (The) 2.5 p 1.5 n
    Last Chance Harvey 3.5 n
    Revolutionary Road 2.5 n
    Taken 4 n
    Valkyrie 3 n

Paul's Reading

  • Laton McCartney: The Teapot Dome Scandal: How Big Oil Bought the Harding White House and Tried to Steal the Country

    Laton McCartney: The Teapot Dome Scandal: How Big Oil Bought the Harding White House and Tried to Steal the Country
    I am fortunate to know the author of this book; he used to be my boss at InformationWEEK. He has written numerous first-rate works, including a swell book about the discovery of the South Pass on the Oregon Trail and the inside story of Bechtel. Here, he takes an obscure but extremely important scandal in American history and makes it come alive. Teapot Dome is hard to grasp for several reasons: it was complicated, it unwound slowly (over almost a decade) because of the nefarious delays in the congressional investigation, and it became less urgent after the death of Harding, the man in the middle. Astoundingly, the GOP, corrupt to the core in the 1920s, escaped unscathed, winning in 1924 and 1928 as Teapot Dome unfolded. McCartney's trademark "you are there" recreations, founded in the carefully researched historical record, make the whole thing squalid affair quite vivid, and his Wyoming roots (half the scandalous land involved was in Wyoming) clearly motivated him to tell the story. (*****)

  • Max Barry: Jennifer Government

    Max Barry: Jennifer Government
    I am not really a sucker for every book I read, which is why this is a four star, not a five star. It begins slowly, and the first half is a confusing, hard slog. But eventually this dystopian vision of corporations rampant and a vestigial government picks up speed, excitement and interest. In Barry's world, your last name is the company you work for, thus, government agent Jennifer Government and her nemesis John Nike. Absurd, rollicking, action-packed and scary. (****)

  • Dick Meyer: Why We Hate Us: American Discontent in the New Millennium

    Dick Meyer: Why We Hate Us: American Discontent in the New Millennium
    Vicki and I heard Dick Meyer on an NPR Podcast (from their excellent series on authors speaking at bookstores), describing this book, which explains why Americans are so angry about their culture and what can be done about it. A former CBS producer, he now works for NPR. He has noticed downward spiral of--well, nearly everything, but he does not believe it is inevitable or unstoppable. It is a refreshing book, full of pointed observations, with an abbreviated but still thoughtful "prescription" section at the end. Both the problem and the solution start with you. (*****)

  • David Sedaris: When You Are Engulfed in Flames

    David Sedaris: When You Are Engulfed in Flames
    David Sedaris is an acquired taste, like smoking. He is a New Yorker essayist and "memoirist," whose life is recounted in essay form in a "heightened," and so more humorous, reality. I find his work laugh out loud funny, and can't recommend his new book too highly. He does not achieve his effects, like Perlman and Allen, with vocabulary, but with simple words and a nasty self-deprecation that never fails to amuse me. (*****)

  • Paul Auster: The Book of Illusions: A Novel

    Paul Auster: The Book of Illusions: A Novel
    For anyone who likes every page of their novel soaked in the feeling of being a Hollywood insider, this piece of literary fiction should be like catnip. Auster has written the tale of a woebegone academic who stumbles across a silent film comedian. The comic made movies for a year and a half, then disappeared 60 years earlier. The academic writes the first and only book about the actor, and is then told his subject is still alive! The interweaving of the two narratives, the richly imagined life of the actor and the sadly lived life of the professor, is skillful in a way that makes me jealous as a writer. It's a great read. Sep. 08 (*****)

  • Christopher Buckley: Supreme Courtship

    Christopher Buckley: Supreme Courtship
    Consistently funny, Buckley walks a fine line between parody, satire and slapstick, and does so in a consistently amusing and entertaining way. Supreme Courtship is the story of a television judge elevated to the Supreme Court by a frustrated president. Buckley deftly skewers modern presidential campaigns and modern internal Supreme Court bickering at the same time, as well as taking a few well-aimed swipes at reality television. There are several characters who are recognizable burlesque version of real people (including Sen. Joe Biden), but unlike, say, Black and White and Dead All Over, such thinly disguised portraits are incidental, rather than central. Rollicking fun. Be sure to read it. Sep. 08 (*****)

  • John Darnton: Black and White and Dead All Over

    John Darnton: Black and White and Dead All Over
    You finish this book feeling as though you are covered with printer's ink. You'll have no trouble spotting Arthur Sulzberger, Jr., R.W. "Johnny" Apple, former executive editors Howell Raines and A.M. "Abe" Rosenthal. The novel features a detailed tour of the important parts of the building (including the hole where the presses used to be and the neglected morgue), as well as a seemingly accurate and well-sketched look at actual daily newspaper operations. Fantastic, engaging and well written. Aug. 08 (*****)

  • Christopher Buckley: Boomsday

    Christopher Buckley: Boomsday
    Once again, Buckley shares his comedic genius with us. This time, he takes the fact that the simultaneous retirement of all the boomers is going to bankrupt the country, mixes it with presidential politics and a little polite sex, and creates gales of hysterical laughter. Smart, witty and clever, this book once again marks Buckley as a worthy successor to the greats of American narrative humor, and makes him one of my favorite living authors. Aug 08 (*****)

  • Keith Colquhoun: Beyond Reason

    Keith Colquhoun: Beyond Reason
    Well-written, fast-paced, entertaining, and, like his other works, endearingly eccentric. If you are interested in a good novel that doesn't read just like every other novel, and some thoughtful chatter about the state of religion, wrapped into an entertaining package, you'll like Beyond Reason. Jun 08 (****)

  • Sven Birkerts: The Gutenberg Elegies: The Fate of Reading in an Electronic Age

    Sven Birkerts: The Gutenberg Elegies: The Fate of Reading in an Electronic Age
    This collection of essays alternates between hopeful and depressing as it soberly considers the future propspects of the act of reading dead-tree media. In this re-issue, the author admits to succumbing to electronic creation, but clings to reading on paper. A reasonable compromise? I think so. Thoughtful and engaging. 1/07. (*****)

Favorite Movies

  • My all-time favorite movie:
    Groundhog Day. I have created a fan site that is universally acknowledged to be the best on the Internet dedicated to this work of art.

    All the rest of my favorite movies (Deadline USA, The Paper, CitizenKane) are Journalism movies.

Counter

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 10/2005